Youtube

Main Page

Space Shuttle replacement Constellation Program has ...

NASA comes across yet another delay that may cause the US to not have transport into space for up to four years. And this time, the US space enthusiasts aren't the only ones who are upset.
Author:spacevidcast
Tags:ares constellation delay nasa orion rocket shuttle space spacevidcast sts

---

Podobne wpisy

Space shuttle replacement
The end of the Space Shuttle era - 2.07
NASA Exploring Cheaper Shuttle Replacement
NASA Constellation Program [NEW VIDEO]
nasa's Constellation Program
ARES - New NASA Space Craft
Arianespace launches Superbird-7 and AMC-21 ...
Space Shuttle Endeavour rollout for STS-126 / LON-400
nasa's canceled spacecraft and rockets, Orion and Area 1-X
Obama changes his space policy: Now in favor of NASA
Launch Failure of spacex Falcon 1 - Flight 3
spacex reaches orbit with Falcon 1 - Flight 4 (full video including Elon Musk statement)
NASA Exploring Cheaper Shuttle Replacement
Constellation: It's for the new generation
Top Gear - Reliant Robin space shuttle - Richard Hammond and James May - BBC
Space Infrastructure
STS-125, Space Shuttle Atlantis and Endeavour and the ...
STS-126 Single Camera view of Launch - Camera 054
Travel: Inside the NASA Space Shuttle
The Continuing Mission
STS125 Launch - OTV Camera 70
STS-126 Single Camera view of Launch - ISS watching launch
Russia Violates Truce! 8-13-08
NASA Orion Parachute Crash Shuttle Replacement
nasa's Constellation Program

Komentarze

I bet the Black Triangle that people has been seeing at night is the test craft for the shuttle replacement not a UFO	kimo57
With over 170 moons to terraform, there is no lack of work. NASA has to drop off canisters of Liquid Cryogens to build atmospheric pressure on the Moon. The expansion ratio of Liquid Oxygen for example, is 861:1 at 68 °F (20 °C). And, 1 litre of Lquid Nitrogen will expand to 700 litres of nitrogen gas at STP. Same for all the other cryogens. Then we wait 2 years for these gases to settle before terraforming the moon.	DeuteriumDrones
The Russian Energia, Buran I and II can each lift 5,300,000 lbs/payload. Russian physics FTW.	DeuteriumDrones
wow still in the dark ages.You would thibk that by now they would have developed something similar to the shuttles of 2001 or the eagles from space 1999.	p9i7
LOL NO. does that module look like the 5000 ton rocket that took off the ground? its only to top tip of it. its designed to go to the moon. not the a 200km above the earth into low orbit.	airpower123
Actually it's the space shuttle that's the piece of shit. It can't even go to the moon. Really it can't, doesn't have the thrust to get outta Earth's gravity well. This thing here is small, compact, no wings, no bells or whistles, just the plain jane shit you need to get the job down. And it's a big, son, let me tell you.	URProductions
@trujames2693 it is what the russians use, and what we used before the shuttle, anyways, the shuttle cant go any farther than the ISS, it just isnt built that way.	numantunak
is it reusable?	trujames2693
The space shuttle can't leave Low Earth Orbit. The Constellation system is far more advanced and can reach the moon... and even ultimately Mars.	pacificguitarist
k, why is nasa replaceing te space shuttle in the first place, this thing doesnt even look like it can exit and reenter the atosmosphere. looks like a piece of shit compared 2 the space shuttle.	trujames2693
Yeah they have to keep building nuclear air craft carriers in case someone wants to refight WWII.	nilbud
yeah, considering it costs around $10 billion to build 1 shuttle, to build a replacement shuttle for a program who's retirement was in the foreseeable future, would've been a waste of major taxpayer money.	PDohm123
Uhm, Boeing and Lockheed Martin were both given the chance to produce vehicles for the space program. Lockheed Martin won, and is developing the Orion series of crew and cargo modules...	PDohm123
Oh yes... let's give private companies more ways to make money, and influence our future, or lack there of. Yes, very smart move.	PDohm123
Well the Obama administration has decided money is more important than further exploration into space. NASA won't be returning to the moon by 2020, in fact, it isn't going to for a long time. NASA can't get the money to build a base on the moon to train astronauts for mars missions. Obama wants his fried chicken and pot so now NASA gets 40 years to develop technology to fly to an asteroid nearby Earth to use as a stepping stone to reach Mars. This country is run by a FUCKING RETARD!	CDBigShow
space technology is just not all that profitable. for instance there's only something like 2 factories that produce the fuel that the shuttle uses and i don't think they replaced the one that exploded a while back.	mashersmasher
in case you didn't know the US is in a recession. you'd be amazed how the Phoenix lander turned out considering it was built out of 10 year old spare parts and equipment from an abandoned rover project. give nasa a break!	mashersmasher
NASA is an old dog that needs to be forced retired yesterday. They are just disgracing themselves with each new attempt to send a gian sewer pipe into space. The future is in the hands of space privateers.	wiseguygabriel
virgin enterprises (bad spelling) made a better ''shuttle''	fuadali16
Sorry, a bit bad choise of words.	MokomaSusi
Uh, space is 0 gravity. But I see your point it takes more power to move them right? :P	DarkAlex174
I think that if we beat the Russians to the moon once we can do it again	rottingpig5
I dont understand why a large private company can't make a space shuttle 100% better then the current one?? where is Martin or Boeing where are the Chinese, Japanese? unless space is not that important after all.. or am i missing something here?	a4ol
sorry for the spelling but thats what happens when you press submitt before you are finished.	passycot
where is the international space station being built.? I find it amazing that by the time man lands on the moon again it will have been he best part of 5o years sinse they were last there. Mans explorration of space is pathetic when you think about it considering the vastness of space,. i feel the shuttle program should have been doneawy with atleast 10 years ago.	passycot

Biznes|Navia